I want to open a parenthesis environmentally sustainable architecture.
Lately I see this kind of architecture mushrooming almost fashionable, I would like to stress that one thing is to make architecture with environmentally sustainable materials in an environmentally, and another one is an excuse created by the architecture of the structures that obstruct the view and create a dimensional space.
The fact is that they seem to be justified because using materials compatible with nature, and filling them with green terraces or gardens and greenhouses, they try to camouflage in nature.
In this I have my doubts, sometimes seem almost like little monsters that come out of the ground, covered with green, it does nothing if there's to incredible heights, the important thing is that they are environmentally sustainable, and the disfigurement of the environment and view of where we? No, it's important that meet certain standards, but lately the WWF has created a set of guidelines for eco-buildings. It may seem small, but in reality this means that respect the ecological associations are moving with greater knowledge of the facts of the same architects.
you place some so-called sustainable architectures that reflect what has just been said.
Tropicool KL
Atelier Date
MOOV
Mass Studies
Time links Ziggurat
Romses Architects
By now we see sustainable architecture tuti ii types: buildings such as the ziggurat that claim to encapsulate id 1 million inhabitants, creating a natural habitat, a kind of self-contained metropolis, Seoul, or the community where the architect has designed 2590 cells arranged as in a hive.
But the architects of these mega-works have wondered if he really can live like a human being, no longer need to go out? Recently, some scientists are experimenting on astronauts in Russia, the effect of the Mars mission.
Mars 500 experiment is to isolate six individuals looking to create a habitat for them as complete possible in the space allowed by a space mission to 500 days, are now awaiting the results. Individuals who are psychologically selected and trained to be able to live and adapt to confined spaces, each of them will have an area of \u200b\u200b3m2 in a sort of private apartment of 72m2 and for a period of one year and a half, and at the first sign of psychological instability will be pulled from this environment.
This means that it is not so easy to decide to live a certain number of people in architecture and sustainable cities where lack nothing, not the architects took into account a very important thing: to be in contact with nature, with life , but close does not mean open to the world, socialize, travel, live out ...
